VERIFIED

Gin

Safety: 75/100

0.0(0)

Gin-MCP bridges Gin APIs to MCP clients with zero-config, automatically exposing endpoints as tools for AI assistants and other MCP-enabled applications.

MCP ServersDevelopmentData & DatabasesSearch & WebProductivityAI & LLMFinance & CryptoUtilitiesFreemium

Boost this tool

Subscribe to listing upgrades or segmented pushes.

Overview

Gin-MCP bridges Gin APIs to MCP clients with zero-config, automatically exposing endpoints as tools for AI assistants and other MCP-enabled applications.

Gin-MCP is relatively safe for read-only APIs or APIs with well-defined schemas. However, it becomes risky when used with APIs that handle sensitive data or perform destructive operations without proper authentication and authorization mechanisms. Careful consideration should be given to the exposed endpoints and the potential impact of unauthorized access.

Performance is primarily determined by the Gin API's efficiency. Gin-MCP adds minimal overhead, mainly related to schema inference and request routing.

Cost depends on the Gin API's resource consumption (CPU, memory, network). Gin-MCP itself has minimal cost implications.

CloudGo70 starsMITCI/CD

Connections & Capabilities

Connects To

GitHub

Capabilities

ReadWrite

Client Compatibility

Claude Desktop

full

Cursor

full

Windsurf

untested

VS Code (Copilot)

untested

Tools (2)

safe

GET_ping

Responds with a 'pong' message to check API availability.

Read-only operation with no side effects.

safe

GET_users_id

Retrieves user information based on the provided user ID.

Read-only operation that retrieves user data.

Security

Auth Method

None

Data Locality

cloud

Known Risks

!Unauthenticated access to exposed API endpoints.
!Potential for information disclosure through automatically generated schemas.
!Risk of unintended exposure of sensitive endpoints due to automatic discovery.
!Vulnerability to injection attacks if input validation is not properly implemented in the Gin API.
!Denial-of-service attacks if the Gin API is not properly rate-limited.

Safety Score

moderate risk

Positive

+Automatic discovery of routes reduces manual configuration errors.
+Schema inference simplifies tool creation and reduces potential schema mismatches.
+Filtering options (tags, operation IDs) allow selective exposure of endpoints.
+Can be deployed within an existing Gin application, limiting external exposure.

Risks

-Automatic schema inference might not always be accurate, requiring manual adjustments.
-Exposes API endpoints to MCP clients, potentially increasing the attack surface.
-Lack of built-in authentication mechanisms in the basic setup requires external implementation.
-Improperly configured BaseURL can lead to incorrect routing and potential information disclosure.
-Over-reliance on automatic discovery can lead to unintended exposure of sensitive endpoints.

Use Cases

AI Assistant Integration

-Enabling AI assistants to access and interact with existing Gin APIs.
-Providing AI assistants with real-time data from Gin-based applications.
-Allowing AI assistants to trigger actions within Gin-based systems.

Code Generation and Automation

-Generating code snippets based on API specifications.
-Automating API testing and documentation.
-Creating custom tools for interacting with Gin APIs.

Application Development

-Rapidly prototyping new features using existing Gin APIs.
-Integrating Gin APIs with other MCP-compatible tools and services.
-Building custom dashboards and monitoring tools for Gin-based applications.

Who Is This For?

Best For

Rapidly exposing existing Gin APIs to MCP-compatible clients.
Prototyping new AI-powered applications that interact with Gin APIs.
Integrating Gin APIs with other MCP-enabled tools and services.
Simplifying API discovery and documentation for AI assistants.

Not Ideal For

APIs that handle highly sensitive data without proper authentication.
APIs that perform destructive operations without proper authorization and auditing.
Environments where security is paramount and zero-config solutions are not acceptable.

Autonomy & Execution

Default ModeRead and Write enabled

Autonomy depends entirely on the underlying Gin API's capabilities and security measures. Gin-MCP itself does not provide any sandboxing or access control mechanisms.

StatelessYes

Retry LogicNot documented

ConcurrencyNot documented

Production Tip

Implement robust authentication and authorization mechanisms in your Gin API before exposing it through Gin-MCP in a production environment.

FAQ

What is Model Context Protocol (MCP)?

MCP is a protocol that allows AI tools and applications to discover and interact with APIs in a standardized way.

How does Gin-MCP simplify API integration with AI tools?

Gin-MCP automates the process of exposing Gin APIs as MCP tools, reducing the need for manual configuration and boilerplate code.

Does Gin-MCP provide authentication or authorization?

No, Gin-MCP does not provide built-in authentication or authorization. You need to implement these mechanisms in your Gin API.

Can I customize the generated MCP tool schemas?

Yes, you can use the `RegisterSchema` function to explicitly define schemas for specific routes.

How can I control which endpoints are exposed as MCP tools?

You can use tags or operation IDs to filter the exposed endpoints.

What happens if automatic schema inference is incorrect?

You can use `RegisterSchema` to manually define the correct schema.

Is Gin-MCP suitable for production environments?

Yes, but you should ensure that your Gin API has proper authentication, authorization, and input validation mechanisms in place.

Key Features

Development Data & Databases Search & Web Productivity AI & LLM Finance & Crypto Utilities

Zero-config integration - Expose Gin endpoints as MCP tools with a single line of code.

MCP Protocol Compliance - Automatically maps Gin API structures to the standardized Model Context Protocol.

Seamless API Mapping - Dynamically bridges RESTful endpoints for immediate AI assistant consumption.

Reduced Boilerplate - Eliminates manual schema generation for AI tool definitions.

Use Cases & Problems Solved

Use Cases

•Use when you need to bridge existing Gin-based web services to Model Context Protocol clients without rewriting your backend logic.
•Perfect for surfacing internal API endpoints directly into AI-powered development environments like Claude Desktop or Cursor.
•Ideal if you need to rapidly prototype AI agents that require real-time access to your Gin-authored application data.
•Great for developers who want to enable LLM-driven interaction with RESTful services using a zero-configuration integration approach.
•Use when building internal tool suites where your existing Go-based API business logic needs to be instantly executable by AI assistants.

Problems Solved

✓Eliminates the need to manually write and maintain custom tool definitions for every Gin API endpoint you want an AI to access.
✓Reduces the overhead of mapping RESTful API structures to MCP-compatible tool schema definitions.
✓Removes the friction of integrating legacy Go web services into modern AI-driven agentic workflows.
✓Solves the lack of interoperability between standard Go web frameworks and MCP-enabled AI development tools.

Who It's For

Go backend engineers building APIs for internal enterprise toolsAI application developers integrating LLMs with existing Go infrastructureDevOps engineers creating automated agentic workflows for system managementFull-stack developers transitioning existing Gin microservices into AI-ready architectures

Metrics

Discovered2/14/2026

Reviews0

Saved By0 users

Related Tools

Gin | AI Builder Hub Review & Alternatives | Flaex AI